The effectiveness of any government is a measure of several contributory factors. One of them is the representation of various publics. The other point is the responsiveness of governing regime to the needs of its people. Furthermore, there is the issue of multi-level governance. Can the government run and maintain parallel institutions meant that are meant for enhancing the government’s own operations?
As such, several contributing factors could answer the question of what is wrong with the Canadian house of common. For instance, the elected officials could be poor such that they cannot represent the interests of the citizens properly. As well, the configuration of the political institutions might hold back representatives who wish to represent the best interests of the public. Again, there is a possibility that the elected people might not be right representatives of the majority of the public, which would make it hard for the government to institute multilevel governance. Nonetheless, there is doubt on the subject of representatives or leaders being poor or having bad intentions to their own followers.