The best approach to Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making in Forensic Psychology is to follow the customary steps as envisaged universally. This specific style was specifically designed to enable forensic psychologists to settle ethical matters. Many of the ethical challenges faced by forensic psychologists were quite intricate, and the amount of information required for suitable remedial action was quite extensive. Therefore it was recommended that practitioners foresee probable ethical conflicts and plan for an appropriate plan of action well in advance. This would envisage recognizing that there might be problems and the importance of circumstances leading to the problem.
Being aware of the problem helps to identify and avail appropriate ethical and legal resources to solve the problem after taking into consideration individual attitude and principled standards. This helps in building up probable answers to the problem after considering the credible conclusion of various solutions. After studying various solutions, practitioners can choose the best solution and follow that course of action to obtain the required outcome.
For Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making in Forensic Psychology forensic psychologists must remember that many forms of behaviors could be suitable with the number of options available. There is a difference between ethical, legal, moral and professional evaluations, and these coincidences should not be described to elucidate ethical issues or moral predicaments. Obviously, if a practitioner resorts to unacceptable ethical activities, he/she usually has to contend with harmful results. If a forensic psychologist views such activities in a colleague, he/she must take appropriate measures to correct the situation.
Sometimes in Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making in Forensic Psychology, there are situations in which a forensic psychologist feels uncomfortable and uneasy. In such situations, the psychologist analyzes the reason for the negative feelings and concentrates on those essentials that have generated these feelings. An example would be that a psychologist is treating someone who has been in an accident. The situation could become uncomfortable for the psychologist if the patient’s lawyer asked him/her to give a detailed report describing the condition of the person under treatment, the amount of disability sustained and the connection between the accident and the trauma the patient suffered because of the accident.